A bill advancing through the Florida Senate is stirring national debate over privacy rights, airspace control, and the use of force. If passed, Senate Bill 1422 would permit Florida homeowners to take action against drones hovering within 500 feet above their private property. The bill's language authorizes the use of “reasonable force” to prevent or halt drone surveillance—but critics say the wording may be too vague and easily misinterpreted.
Supporters argue the legislation is about reclaiming privacy in an age of rapidly expanding drone usage, which has raised concerns across the U.S. about aerial spying, unauthorized recordings, and nuisance behavior. Lawmakers backing the bill say it would give residents a legal option to defend their property from drones potentially spying on them or their families.
However, opponents—including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—warn that the bill could be interpreted as permission to shoot down drones, which are currently classified as aircraft under federal law. Under existing rules, it is a federal crime to shoot at any aircraft, including unmanned aerial vehicles, and violators may face serious fines or criminal charges.
The proposal does not explicitly mention firearms, but the phrase “reasonable force” has sparked concern about public safety, especially in residential neighborhoods. Legal experts and lawmakers alike are questioning whether the bill might encourage dangerous behavior or lead to confusion about what’s actually allowed.
The bill is part of a broader push to expand Florida’s drone regulations. SB1422 also includes provisions to expand drone-restricted zones, including near prisons, infrastructure sites, and neighborhoods. However, law enforcement agencies would still retain the ability to operate drones for surveillance or emergency purposes.
Back